![]() |
| Becki's Rating: ★★☆☆☆ View on Goodreads |
Title: The Many
Author: Nathan Field
Publisher: KDP
Date of Publication: June 9th, 2016
Format: .doc file
Page Count: 271
Goodreads: Click
Amazon: Associates Link
Recommended? Yes (for the price point)
Similar Books: The Beast of Barcroft, by Bill Schweigert, Flesh and Blood, by Simon Cheshire, Others by James Herbert
My Rating: ★★☆☆☆
Author: Nathan Field
Publisher: KDP
Date of Publication: June 9th, 2016
Format: .doc file
Page Count: 271
Goodreads: Click
Amazon: Associates Link
Recommended? Yes (for the price point)
Similar Books: The Beast of Barcroft, by Bill Schweigert, Flesh and Blood, by Simon Cheshire, Others by James Herbert
My Rating: ★★☆☆☆
Let me begin by saying that the story kept me turning the pages one after another. It took until about a quarter of the way through the book before I felt truly compelled, but the story itself is what made me want to finish in spite of other issues that I had with this book. If it were only a matter of the story, this book is fast-paced and definitely a worthy read. I'm a big fan of medical horror and have been since I was a young teenager, so this book pushed those buttons for me and it kept me reading.
While I did find the story to be interesting, I did not find it to be especially unique and it was easy to guess some of the turns that the story took as I went along. If you've read a lot of medical horror, and horror of the science fiction variety, you've probably run into similar story lines and you'll find certain elements of the plot to be predictable.
The twists and turns in the plot were predictable, and the portion of the story which included a police investigation made the novel feel more like a suspense novel than a horror novel. I found Detective McElroy to be boring, and that his characterization jumped about, leaving me feeling as though I was never on solid footing with the characters in this book (but McElroy in particular). During his chapters of the book, I found myself reading glassy-eyed and unimpressed with the way that the author wrote this character.
In fact, I was unimpressed by the way that he wrote most of the characters. The majority (with perhaps the exception of Isobel, early on when she was first introduced) was flat. At various points in the book Mr. Field names the wrong character (which is confusing to the reader, and an issue which may be corrected in the final copy of the novel).
My advice to Mr. Field is that as a writer, you have to make the reader care about your characters, or they won't care about your story. If you don't care about your characters, then your readers aren't going to care about your characters either, and they will find it more difficult to connect to a story if they cannot connect to the characters who are telling that story.
The writing in this novel was amateurish -- the reading level reading as though written for a younger audience, while the book was especially gory in some parts. It reminded me of other books I've downloaded from Netgalley (such as The Beast of Barcroft) or books I've gotten for free on Amazon (such as Evan After). In fact, the story and its climax bears a striking resemblance to Evan After.
I would tentatively recommend this book to people who have never read medical horror before, as they may find something unique in it that interests you in this novel. If you enjoyed Evan After, you might also enjoy this book.
As for my personal recommendations, I enjoyed Others, by James Herbert, a great deal more. If you enjoyed The Many, you might enjoy Others!
Disclosure: I received a free copy of this novel from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
Disclosure: I received a free copy of this novel from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.





